Allowed

Rakesh Badwal S/O Madu Ram Badwal, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC29 Jan 2024CRLMP/33/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court, Bench at Jaipur, allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC and quashed an FIR for offences under various sections of the IPC, finding that the parties had entered into a compromise and resolved their dispute.

What did the court decide?

The FIR No.995/2023 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) is quashed and set aside. The stay application stands disposed of.

Rakesh Badwal S/O Madu Ram Badwal, Vs… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:4738]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 33/2024

¶4

Rakesh Badwal S/o Madu Ram Badwal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o - 374, Sachivalya Vihar, Riico Kanta, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶8

Ujagar Singh, S/o Daulat Singh, Aged About 62 Years, R/o- 366, Sachivalya Vihar, Riico Kanta, Jaipur, Raj.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP Mr. K.K. Bhinda

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶12

Order

¶13

29/01/2024

¶14

The petitioner and the complainant are present in person before the Court and they have been duly identified by their respective counsel.

¶15

By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.995/2023 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341, 452 & 504 of IPC.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the investigation, the petitioner has entered into a compromise with the complainant. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JP:4738]

[CRLMP-33/2024]

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the aforesaid factual position.

¶21

In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal; considering that the parties have resolved their dispute and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [ AIR 1992 SC 604 ] , the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶22

In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.995/2023 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) is quashed and set aside.

¶23

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶24

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶25

414-Nirmala

Rakesh Badwal S/O Madu Ram Badwal, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Badwal S/O Madu Ram Badwal, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ilmuddin @ Immu S/O Moinuddin @ Latur Chandiwala, Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamruddin @ Kamlesh Son of Shri Saleem Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Manraj S/O Gulab Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Sitaram and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Tarachand Urf Pala Ram Son of Shri Kalu Ram , Vs State of Rajasthan

Amreek Singh S/O Meva Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan