Dismissed
Harlal v. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan HCSOSA/299/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application for suspension of sentence was dismissed because the appellant chose not to press the application despite counsel having argued on merits.
What did the court decide?
Application for suspension of sentence dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2023:RJ-JD:28338-DB]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶3
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 299/2023
¶4
IN
¶5
D.B. Criminal Appeal No.158/2022
¶6
Harlal S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 40 Years, r/o Kangad, P.s. Ratangarh, Dist. Churu (Raj.). (Lodged At Central Jail, Bikaner)
¶7
----Petitioner
¶8
- Versus
¶9
- State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
¶10
- Dhanna Ram S/o Adu Ram, B/c Meghwal, R/o Vill. Kangad, P.s. Ratangarh, Dist. Churu (Raj.).
¶11
----Respondents
¶12
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. J.S. Choudhary, Sr. Advocate |
|---|---|
| assisted byMr. PradeepChoudhary | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi,PP |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Harlal S/o Ramchandra
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Coram
AI extract
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- SOSA/299/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court