Dismissed

Jogsingh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Apr 2023CRLMP/247/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed connected criminal miscellaneous petitions filed against registered FIRs. The court held that the petitions became infructuous because police investigation concluded cognizable offences were made out and a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. was issued.

What did the court decide?

The criminal miscellaneous petitions were dismissed as infructuous; the stay petition was also dismissed.

Jogsingh Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2023/RJJD/009287]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1045/2023

¶4

Hindu Singh S/o Late Shri Nimbsingh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Leelriya Dhora, Ward No. 2, Barmer.

¶5

Sajjan Singh S/o Late Shri Hukam Singh Rajput, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Leelriya Dhora, Ward No. 2, Barmer, At Present House No. A-23 Aashiyana Amarbagh, Pali Road, Kudi, Jodhpur Metropolitan.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Station Housing Officer, Police Station Kotwali, Barmer.

¶9

Heer Singh S/o Shri Balsingh, B/c Rajpurohit, R/o Purohito Ka Vas, Fogera At Present Mohalla Leelriya Dhora, Sardarpura, Behind Jain Temple, Barmer.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 247/2023

¶13

Jogsingh S/o Shri Hukam Singh, Aged About 62 Years, B/c Rajput

¶14

Chhailsingh S/o Shri Hukam Singh, Aged About 50 Years, B/c Rajput

¶15

Ganga Singh S/o Jabar Singh, Aged About 25 Years, B/c Rajput Petitioners No.1 to 3 are resident of Khiwalisra Tehsil Bayatu Dist. Barmer

¶16

Ridmalsingh S/o Shri Anopsingh, Aged About 25 Years, B/c Rajput R/o Vill. Dharoi Tehsil Shiv Dist. Barmer

¶17

Govindsingh S/o Shri Chandan Singh, Aged About 50 Years, B/c Rajput R/o Vill. Bonada Tehsil Pokaran Dist. Jaisalmer

¶18

----Petitioners

¶19

Versus

¶20

State Of Rajasthan, Through Housing Officer Ps Kotwali Barmer

¶21

Heer Singh S/o Shri Balsingh, B/c Rajpurohit R/o Purohito Ka Vas, Fogera At Present Mohalla Leelriya Dhora

[2023/RJJD/009287]

[CRLMP-1045/2023]

(2 of 2)

Sardarpura Behind Jain Temple Barmer

¶26

----Respondents

¶27

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Satya Prakash Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Mukesh Trivedi, PP Mr.Ganga Ram, Police Inspector, SHO, Kotwali Barmer.

¶28

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶29

Order

¶30

10/04/2023

¶31

Mr.Ganga Ram, Police Inspector, SHO Kotwali Barmer is present in person. He submits that after investigation, they come to the conclusion that cognizable offence is made out against the petitioners and a notice as required under Section 41-A of Cr.P.c. has already been issued to them.

¶32

In the aforesaid circumstances, the present criminal misc. petitions have become infrucutuous and are dismissed accordingly. Stay Petition also stands dismissed.

¶33

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶34

29-30 NK/-

Jogsingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jogsingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deda Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Vs State and Ors.

Beeja Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Revant Ram @ Revant Mal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shiv Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravi Vs Sangeeta