Rajendra v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses two criminal miscellaneous petitions as infructuous because the main case was already decided by the trial court. No full reasoning was provided in this summary order.
This order dismisses two criminal miscellaneous petitions as infructuous because the main case was already decided by the trial court. No full reasoning was provided in this summary order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/009125]
[CRLMP-1734/2017]
(1 of 2)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1734/2017
Dariya Singh S/o Shri Dharma Ram, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Village Momanbas, Tehsil Bhadra District Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1740/2017
Rajendra S/o Shri Dharma Ram, Resident Of Village Momanbas, Tehsil Bhadra District Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2)
[2023/RJJD/009125]
[CRLMP-1734/2017]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
06/04/2023
Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the main case has already decided before the trial court, therefore, both the misc. petitions have become infructuous.
In view of submission made, both the misc. petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay applications are also dismissed.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
115 & 116-MS/-
Dariya Singh
The State Of Rajasthan
Ratan
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court