A single-judge order disposed of a writ petition concerning service representation. The court closed proceedings in light of a coordinate bench judgment and directed the State to consider a subsequent representation within three months.
Directed State to consider representation within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11929/2022
Kiranveer Singh S/o Shri Lal Singh, Aged About 46 Years, Head Constable No. 66, Resident - V/p Sabora, Nadbai, Dist. Bharatpur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
O.P. Sangwa |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
24/08/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ petition stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kuldeep Singh & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3926/2013 , decided on 26.04.2013.
It is further contended that for the present; the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, within a
(2 of 2) [CW-11929/2022]
time frame, in the backdrop of the adjudication in the case of Kuldeep Singh (supra), which he is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ petition proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation before the respondents enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Kuldeep Singh (supra). In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, however, in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation alongwith a certified copy of this order.
With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ petition stands disposed of.
The stay application also stands disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
252-Rashi/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ proceedings should be closed in light of a coordinate bench judgment?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kuldeep Singh & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3926/2013Followed¶15
Kiranveer Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Principal Secretary
Adgp (Armed Battalion)
Commandant, 2nd Battalion
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
