Petitioner's writ petition against re-transfer was dismissed by this Court as having become infructuous due to subsequent transfer and the stay application was also dismissed.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; stay application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9358/2022
Babu Bishnoi D/o Hardan Ram, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Siyako Ki Dhani, Sobhala Jaitmal, Panchayat Samiti Dhorimana, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hapu Ram Vishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajat Arora for Mr. K.S. Rajpurohit, AAG
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
23/08/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the impugned order, the petitioner has subsequently been re-transferred and therefore, the present petition does not survive.
In view of the submission made, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The stay application also stands dismissed.
(REKHA BORANA),J
60-AnilKC/-
Babu Bishnoi D/o Hardan Ram
State Of Rajasthan
REKHA BORANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
