Allowed

Smt. Champa Devi W/O Shri Harpal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Aug 2022CRLMB/9136/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jaipur allowed a bail application filed by Smt. Champa Devi, an elderly woman in her first instance of judicial custody for offences. Considering her age and innocence, the court granted bail with specific undertaking conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioner subject to undertaking conditions regarding production before concerned officers.

Smt. Champa Devi W/O Shri Harpal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶3

9136/2022

¶4

Smt. Champa Devi W/o Shri Harpal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Katoriwala Tibara, Raysis, Police Station Sadar District Alwar Rajasthan. (Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Central Jail, Alwar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For : Mr. Naina Ram Saran, PP Respondent(s)

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶11

Order

¶12

05/08/2022

¶13

izkFkhZ;ka dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk] iqfyl Fkkuk] lnj] ftyk vyoj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 401@2022 vUrxZr /kkjk 498&,] 306 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds ekeys esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh xbZ ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu

¶15

fd;k x;kA

¶16

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkfFkZ;ka dk rdZ jgk fd izkfFkZ;ka dks bl ekeys esa feF;k :i ls Qalk;k x;k gS] izkfFkZ;ka }kjk dHkh Hkh erdk dks ijs'kku ugha fd;k x;k vkSj u gh dHkh ngst dh ekax dh xbZ] izkfFkZ;ka 65 o"khZ; o) efgyk gS] tks e`rdk dh lkl FkhA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu jgk fd ekeys es a vuqla/kku iw.kZ gks pqdk gS o ckn vuqla/kku vkjksi&i= vUrxZr /kkjk 498&,] 306 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk izLrqr gks pqdk gS]

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-9136/2022]

¶18

izkfFkZ;ka ds fo:) iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdkMZ ugha gS] og dkQh le; ls vfHkj{kk gS] izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izkfFkZ;ka dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gSA

¶19

;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k ,oa fuosnu fd;k fd izkfFkZ;ka erdk dh lkl gS] ftl ij erdk dks ngst ds fy, izrkfMr djus ,oa vkRegR;k ds fy, izsfjr djus dk vfHk;ksx gSA vr% leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gSaA

¶20

lquk x;k ,oa leLr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶21

izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr izkfFkZ;ka dh 65 o"kZ dh vk;q] mldh vfHkj{kk vof/k rFkk iwoZ esa mlds fo:) dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdkMZ ugha gksus ds rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;k fcuk izkfFkZ;ka dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkfFkZ;ka Jherh pEik nsoh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkfFkZ;ka bl ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mlsa bl ekeys esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶23

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶24

JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /16

Smt. Champa Devi W/O Shri Harpal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Champa Devi W/O Shri Harpal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashwini Shrma Son of Ashok Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhanraj Kumawat S/O Late Shri Ghisalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Salman @ Suka @ Kabutar S/O Shahjad Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Harun S/O Samsudin Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijendersingh Son of Shri Shyamlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramdev S/O Rameshwar Vs State of Rajasthan