In a bail application under Section 438 CrPC, the High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur dismissed the petition. The court rejected arguments based solely on arrest due to language barriers, noting insufficient evidence to support the defence version of facts presented by the Public Prosecutor.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4867/2022
Ashwini Sharma Son Of Ashok Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Daad Vari Khetri, Thata Vari, District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajkumar Sharma, For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Mahala, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
15/07/2022
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk] czg~eiqjh ftyk t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&711@2021 vijk/k varxZr 420]467]468]471 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k esa feF;k Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ifjokfn;k ehuk lksuh ds lkFk le>kSrk Hkh gks pqdk gS ,oa le>kSrs ds rgr yxHkx nks yk[k :i;s ykSVk Hkh fn;s gSaA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr cSad deZpkjh gS] vr% mlds fxjQ~rkj gksus ij mlds Hkfo’; ij foijhr izHkko iM+sxkA og vUos’k.k esa lg;ksx djus ds fy;s rRij gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, dgk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us cSad deZpkjh gksrs gq, vius in
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-4867/2022]
dk nq:i;ksx fd;k gSA ml ij ifjoknh i{k ,oa vU; O;fDr ls ikWfylh ds uke ij 7]32]800@& :i;s izkIr djus ,oa dwVjfpr ckW.M rS;kj djus ds xEHkhj vkjksi gSaA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls dwVjfpr ckW.M ds laca/k esa vUos’k.k djuk gS ,oa mlds }kjk izkIr jkf”k dh cjkenxh Hkh cdk;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls vfHkj{kk esa iwNrkN (custodial interrogation) dh tkuh gSA vfxze tekur vkosnu [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA
geus mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij ,pMh,Qlh cSad dk deZpkjh jgrs gq, ifjoknh i{k ,oa vU; O;fDr ls ikWfylh ds uke ij 7]32]800@& :i;s izkIr djus ,oa dwVjfpr ckW.M rS;kj djus ds vkjksi gSaA vuqla/kku esa nks ckW.M dwVjfpr ik;s x;s gSa] D;ksafd mDr ckW.M cSad ls tkjh ugha gksuk vafdr fd;k x;k gSA vfHk;kstu i{k }kjk dwVjfpr ckW.M ,oa jkf”k dh cjkenxh ds dze esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vuqla/kku esa vko”;drk crkbZ xbZ gSA mijksDrkuqlkj vkjksi dh izd`fr ,oa vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ladfyr lkexzh dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
Pradeep Thawani/102
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in a case charged with offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC regarding cheque forgery.
Ashwini Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
