Dismissed

Mohammad Salman @ Suka @ Kabutar S/O Shahjad Ali v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Jul 2022CRLAS/1260/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the criminal appeals by Mohammed Salman and Wasim Ahmed, who had earlier been granted bail. The court found no justification to interfere with the earlier bail order and disposed of the appeals, upholding the lower court's decision to maintain bail status for the appellants despite charges under Section 307 IPC.

What did the court decide?

None. Appellants bail status not altered; appeals dismissed.

Mohammad Salman @ Suka @ Kabutar S/O Shahjad Ali Vs State… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1260/2022

¶3

Mohammad Salman @ Suka @ Kabutar S/o Shahjad Ali, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of House No. 15, Mehant Nagar 60 Feet Road, Sadala, Jaipur ( At Present Confined In Central Jain Jaipur )

¶4

----Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

¶7

Rahul Dhanka S/o Kishan Lal Dhanka, Resident Of 264, Dhanka Basti, Yadavon Ka Chowk, Hasanpura P.s. Sadar Jaipur West Rajasthan

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1261/2022

¶11

Wasim Ahmed Son Of Shri Nawab Khan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o House No. 1508, Gali Number 07, Nahari Ka Naka Masjid Ke Pass, Police Station Shastri Nagar District Jaipur City Rajasthan (Presently Accused Petitioner Confined In Center Jail Jaipur)

¶12

----Appellant

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

¶15

Rahul Dhanka Son of Shri Kishan Lal Dhanka, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 264, Dhanka Basti, Yadavo Ka Chowk Hasanpura, Jaipur Sadar Jaipur West Rajasthan

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vikram Sharma, Mr. Arif Khan with Mr. Majhar Hussain

¶18

For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Mahala, PP Dr. Mithlesh Kumar, for Respondent

¶19

(2 of 3)

¶20

[CRLAS-1260/2022 & 1261/2022]

¶21

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶22

Order

¶23

15/07/2022

¶24

vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 14&,¼2½ vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr mDr nksuksa tekur vihysa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k izdj.k½] t;iqj egkuxj&izFke }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 07-072022 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh xbZ gaS] ftlds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk] tokgj lfdZy] t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k & 279@2022 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 147]148]149]341]323]307]506 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk]a /kkjk 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2)(Va) vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ,oa /kkjk 67 vkbZ-Vh- ,DV esa vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk [kkfjt fd;k x;kA

¶25

vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dk rdZ jgk fd vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks bl izdj.k esa feF;k Qalk;k x;k gSA fdlh Hkh vkgr ds dksbZ izk.k?kkrd pksV dkfjr ugha gqbZ gS] lHkh pksVsa lk/kkj.k izd`fr dh gSaA vfHk;qDrx.k ls izdj.k esa dksbZ cUnwd cjken ugha gqbZ gSA vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr dksbZ vijk/k ugha curkA i{kksa ds e/; :i;ksa ds ysunsu dk fookn gSA izdj.k ds vUos’k.k o vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA lgvfHk;qDrx.k vyQjkt] xkSreflag ,oa cadr lksuh ds tekur vkosnu bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB ls Lohdkj gks pqds gSa] vr% vihysa Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZ gSA

¶26

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd ,oa fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh dk rdZ jgk fd vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k vknru vijk/kh gSaA muds fo:) ifjoknh ds lkFk ekjihV djus ,oa Hk; QSykus ds vk”k; ls lks”ky ehfM;k ij ohfM;ks ok;jy djus ds xEHkhj vkjksi gSaA vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr eksgEen lyeku ds fo:) bl ?kVuk ds i”pkr /kkjk 307 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa vU; vkjksiksa esa nks eqdnes ntZ gks pqds gSaA blds vykok ikap vU; eqdnes iwoZ ls ntZ gSaA bl izdkj bl eqdnes lfgr mlds fo:) 8 eqdnes ntZ gSaA vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr olhe vgen ds fo:) Hkh 15 eqdnes iwoZ ls ntZ gSaA ftu lgvfHk;qDrx.k dks

¶27

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1260/2022 & 1261/2022]

¶28

tekur dk ykHk fn;k x;k gS] muds fo:) xEHkhj vijk/kksa esa iwoZ ls bruh cM+h la[;k esa izdj.k ntZ ugha gSa] vr% vihysa fujLr fd;s ;ksX; gSaA

¶29

geus mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k lyeku ,oa olhe vgen ds fo:) bl izdj.k esa /kkjk 147]148]149]341]323]307]506 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk]a /kkjk 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2)(Va) vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ,oa /kkjk 67 vkbZ-Vh- ,DV ds vkjksi gSa ,oa blds vykok muds fo:) dze”k% 8 ,oa 15 eqdnes iwoZ esa ntZ gksuk crk;k x;k gSA olhe vgen ds fo:) iqfyl Fkkuk] “kkL=huxj }kjk fgLVªh”khV Hkh [kqyh gksus dk nLrkost is”k gqvk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vijk/k dh izdfr ,oa vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vkijkf/kd izofRr dks ns[krs gq, mUgsa tekur ij eqDr fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶30

ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr mDr nksuksa vihysa [kkfjt dh tkrh gSaA

¶31

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶32

Pradeep Thawani/133-134

Mohammad Salman @ Suka @ Kabutar S/O Shahjad Ali v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Salman @ Suka @ Kabutar S/O Shahjad Ali v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chotulal S/O Kalulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sitaram Saini S/O Bansidhar Vs State of Rajasthan

Gulab Chand Vs Mahaveer Prasad Son of Late Shri Nand Kishore

Ashwini Shrma Son of Ashok Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhanraj Kumawat S/O Late Shri Ghisalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Harun S/O Samsudin Vs State of Rajasthan