A special bail application was allowed. The court held that the petitioner was coerced into presenting a false defense testifying the accused appeared on the victim's bail, which was a false accusation not reflecting the true nature of the offence.
Application for anticipatory bail allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8030/2022
Harun S/o Samsudin, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Beech Ka Baas, Sirmoli Jaharkhera, Alwar, Distt Alwar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta, For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nainaram Saran, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
05/08/2022
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk] dksVdkfle] fHkokM+h esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&150@2022 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 419]420]120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k esa feF;k Qalk;k x;k gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr vkjksiksa ls Hkh izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij vf/kdre /kkjk 419 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vijk/k cuuk ekuk tk ldrk gS] tks tekurh; izd`fr dk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vuqla/kku esa mifLFkr gksus ds fy;s rRij gSA mlls fdlh izdkj dh vfHkj{kk esa iwNrkN (custodial interrogation) ugha fd;k tkuk gSA tks tekurukek xyr :i ls U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k tkuk crk;k x;k gS] mls okil ys fy;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdkMZ Hkh ugha gS] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-8030/2022]
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ fn;k gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us U;k;ky; esa viuk okgu lqiqnZxh ij izkIr djus ds fy;s U;k;ky; ds vkns”k dh ikyuk esa QthZ O;fDr [kMk dj dwVjfpr nLrkost yxkdj tekurukek izLrqr djok;k vkSj bl izdkj QtZdkjh dj U;k;ky; ls okgu lqiqnZxh ij izkIr djus dk vlQy iz;kl fd;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls vuqla/kku fd;k tkuk gS ,oa vU; QthZ O;fDr dh tkudkjh izkIr dh tkuh gS] vr% vfxze tekur vkosnu [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA
geus mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gSa fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&66@2022 iqfyl Fkkuk] [kq”k[ksM+k esa tCr”kqnk okgu dks lqiqnZxh ij izkIr djus ds fy;s U;k;ky;] U;kf;d eftLVªsV] dksVdkfle esa izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k] ftls Lohdkj djrs gq, U;k;ky; us ikap&ikap yk[k :i;s dk tekur o lqiqnZxhukek izLrqr djus dk vkns”k fn;k] ftldh ikyuk esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us fdlh vU; ds uke ls vU; O;fDr }kjk tekurukek izLrqr fd;k gS] tks vUos’k.k esa QthZ gksuk ik;k x;k gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk U;kf;d dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku /kks[kk/kM+h dj U;k;ky; ls vkns”k izkIr djus vkSj okgu dks NqM+kus dk iz;kl fd;k x;k gSA bl LVst ij ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gksA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls vuqla/kku fd;k tkuk ,oa vU; O;fDr] ftlds }kjk tekurukek izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] mlds laca/k esa Hkh tkudkjh dh tkuh gSA mijksDrkuqlkj rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
Pradeep Thawani/60
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was prevented from recording evidence or cross-examining witnesses due to coercive acts.
Whether the graver nature of the offence in the first instance and the false accusation warrant anticipatory bail.
Whether the cause for anticipatory bail existed given the petitioner's attempt to produce the accused on bail.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Harun S/o Samsudin
State Of Rajasthan
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
