Hon'ble Court granted interim bail to the accused petition, holding it unnecessary to demand fresh security given the nature of the proceedings and prior actions by the accused.
Bail to the accused petition granted; leave to approach Supreme Court permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
10129/2022
Ramdev S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sansi Basti, Srinagar, P.s. Srinagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined Central Jail Ajmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Yadav For : Mr. Naina Ram Saran, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
05/08/2022
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk] iqfyl Fkkuk] vkcdkjh fujks/kd ny] ulhjkckn] ftyk vtesj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 23@2022&23 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 19@54 jktLFkku vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e ds ekeys esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh xbZ ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks bl ekeys esa feF;k :i ls Qalk;k x;k gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds dCts ls ek= 40 iOos jk;y Dykfld fOgLdh ds cjken gksus dk vfHk;ksx gS rFkk mlds fo:) /kkjk 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e dk izdj.k ntZ gqvk gS] tks izFke Js.kh eftLVªsV }kjk fopkj.k ;ksX; gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ls fdlh izdkj dh
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-10129/2022]
cjkenxh gksuk Hkh 'ks"k ugha gS] og dkQh le; ls vfHkj{kk gS] izdj.k ds vuqla/kku esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izkFkhZ dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gSA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k ,oa fuosnu fd;k fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ,d vknru vijk/kh gS] mlds fo:) blh izdfr ds 7 vU; izdj.k lfgr dqy 8 vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gq, gSa] ftuesa ls 6 izdj.kksa esa mls nks"kfl) djkj fn;k tkdj n.Mkfn"V fd;k x;k gSA mudk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr@izkFkhZ dh vkijkf/kd i"BHkwfe o leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gSaA
lquk x;k ,oa leLr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
izdj.k dh miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ds vuqlkj vfHk;qDr izkFkhZ ij iqfyl Fkkuk Jhuxj esa 8 izdj.k ntZ gq, gSa] ftuesa ls 7 izdj.k 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e ls lEcfU/kr gS o ,d izdj.k 143] 341] 323 Hkknala- ls lEcfU/kr gSaA bu lHkh ekeyksa esa ls izkFkhZ vfHk;qDr dks 6 ekeyksa esa nks"kfl) djkj fn;k tkdj n.Mkfn"V fd;k x;k gSA ftl ls izdV gksrk gS fd vfHk;qDr@izkFkhZ }kjk fujUrj vijk/k dh iqujko`fRr dh tk jgh gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, fcuk vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrkA
ifj.kkeLo:i vfHk;qDr@izkFkhZ jkenso dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /19
3 issues framed by the court
Whether security must be fixed before granting bail when Supreme Court has already been approached?
Whether bail should be granted to the respondent petition in the context of multiple arrests and bail applications by the same person.
Whether the court should grant leave to approach the Supreme Court on bail matter despite multiple Supreme Court stays.
Ramdev
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
Jitendra Singh Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
