Allowed

Naresh @ Banti v. State

Rajasthan HC2 Aug 2017CRLMB/6454/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted interim bail. The petitioner could not approach prior court for anticipatory bail after trial commencement as the court was non-functional and over 60km away. The High Court exercised discretion to bail him pending trial.

What did the court decide?

Granted interim bail. Ordered presence of public prosecutor and defense counsel before the SDJM in Udaipur immediately and subsequently.

Naresh @ Banti Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Second Bail No. 6454 / 2017

¶3

Naresh @ Banti S/o Shri Unkar Dangi, Aged About 21 Years, R/oLoyra, P.S. Amba Mata, Distt. Udaipur. (Presently Lodged in Central Jail Udaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Rajasthan

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls vf/koDrk Jh jkeflag jkoy] yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,y vkj mik/;k;] mifLFkrA

¶9

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh lanhi egrks fu.kZ;

¶10

02@08@2017

¶11

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k

¶12

lafgrk iqfylFkkuk ?kklk ftyk mn;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 17@2017] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 392] 411 o 414 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds ekeys esa mls tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

izkFkhZ dh dh vksj ls izLrqr iwoZ tekur izkFkZuk i= ml Lrj ij fujLr fd;k x;k Fkk tc r¶rh’k tkjh Fkh] izkFkhZ dks ;g NwV nh xbZ Fkh fd og vkjksi i= izLrqr fd, tkus ds i’pkr iqu% tekur izkFkZuk i= is’k dj ldsxkA vc vkjksi i= izLrqr gks tkus ds i’pkr izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh jkoy dk rdZ jgk fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ 25 fnu ds foyac ls izLrqr dh xbZA nkSjkus r¶rh’k izkFkhZ dh igpku dh dk;Zokgh ugha djokbZ xbZ rFkk ywVh xbZ uFk Hkh lgvfHk;qDr iqfur ds dCts ls cjken dh xbZA izkFkhZ dks vijk/k ls tksM+us yk;d dksbZ

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-6454/2017]

¶16

lk{; i=koyh ij ekStwn ugha gSA vr% os fuosnu djrs gS fd izkFkhZ tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk gdnkj gSA

¶17

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us iqjtksj fojks/k dj tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA mUgksaus izkFkhZ ds vkijkf/kd vkpj.k dh fjiksVZ is’k djhA ijUrq] os Hkh bl rF; ls Lohd`fr tkfgj djrs gSa fd izkFkhZ dh f’kuk[rxh dh dk;Zokgh ugha djokbZ xbZ] u gh mlds dCts ls dksbZ cjkenxh gqbZ gSA

¶18

lquk x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA mijksDr lHkh rF;ksa dks ns[krs gq,] bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa izkFkhZ dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus ds mfpr vk/kkj i=koyh ij ekStwn gSaA

¶19

rnuqlkj] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fcuk fVIi.kh fd, ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns’k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ ujs’k mQZ cUVh iqfylFkkuk ?kklk ftyk mn;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 17@2017] ds ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds lUrks”kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq] ipkl gtkj :i, dk cU/ki= ,oa iphl&iphl gtkj :i, dh nks izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs] rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶20

¼lanhi esgrk½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶21

,l-,u-yksgjk@28

Naresh @ Banti v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh @ Banti v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Kumar Vs State and Anr.

Prahalad Vs State

State of Rajasthan Vs Amit Kumar

State Vs Ram Kumar

State Vs Malkeet Singh and Anr.

U.O.I. Vs Dinesh Chandra