This High Court allowed an appeal against an order quashing complaints, setting aside the lower court's decision and granting liberty to recall the quashing order. The High Court held that the complaints were validly filed at a public place.
The order quashing the complaints was set aside, and the appellants were granted liberty to recall the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 122 / 2016
State of Rajasthan.
----Appellant
Versus
Both resident of Partewala, P.S. Sadar Abohar, Panjab.
----Respondent
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,y vkj mik/;k;] v;kphx.k dh vksj ls vf/koDrk Jh th ts xqIrk mifLFkrA
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh lanhi egrks vkn’k@fus .kZ;
03@08@2017
lquk x;kA jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls ;g nj[okLr vUrxZr /kkjk 378¼iii½&¼i½ n.M izfØ;k lafgrk fo}ku fof’k”V U;k;k/kh’k] ,u-Mh-ih-,l- izdj.k Jhxaxkuxj }kjk l= izdj.k la[;k 21@2014 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 02-02-2016 ds fo:) vihy izLrqr djus dh vuqefr pkgrs gq, izLrqr dh xbZ gSA mDr fu.kZ; ls fo}ku fof’k”V U;k;k/kh’k }kjk v;kph eydhr flag dks Lokid vkS”kf/k ,oa eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e 1985 dh /kkjk 8@15 o 8@15 lifBr /kkjk 29 ,oa v;kph pj.kthrflag dks Lokid vkS”kf/k ,oa eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e 1985 dh /kkjk 8@15 lifBr /kkjk 25 o 8@15 lifBr /kkjk 29 ds vkjksiksa ls nks”keqDr fd;k x;kA
vfHk;kstu dh dgkuh ds eqrkfcd] cjkenxh vf/kdkjh Jh Hkokuhflag us fnukad 29-04-2016 dks nksgij 2%10 ih,e ij LdkfiZ;ks dkj uacj vkjts 14 ;w, 9631 dh
(2 of 3)
[CRLLA-122/2016]
ryk’kh yh rks mlesa MªkbZoj ds lkFk cSBs O;fDr ¼eydhrflag½ ds gkFk esa ,d IykfLVd dk FkSyk idM+k x;k ftlesa rhu fdyksxzke MksMkpwjk Hkjk gqvk FkkA
fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vius fu.kZ; esa ;g ik;k fd cjkenxh dh dk;Zokgh ,d ,sls LFkku ls dh xbZ tgka ij dkQh yksxksa dh vkoktkgh FkhA ckotwn blds] tCrh vf/kdkjh us
dksbZ Lora= ekSrfcj ryk’kh ds nkSjku ugha j[kkA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us ;g Hkh ekuk fd tCrh dh dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku tks QnkZr cukbZ xbZ muesa vafdr rF;ksa ls iw.kZ dgkuh lansgkLin izrhr gksrh FkhA lkFk gh ftu iqfyl eqykfteku us tCrh dh lk{; U;k;ky; esa izLrqr djh muds dFkuksa esa Hkh xaHkhj fojks/kkHkk”k ik, x,A bu lHkh gkykr dks ns[krs gq,] fopkj.k U;k;ky; us v;kphx.k dks vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds tfj, nks”keqDr ?kksf”kr fd;kA
esjh jk; esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vk{ksfir fu.kZ; esa fudkyk x;k fu”d”kZ iw.kZr;k lgh gSA cjkenxh nksigj 2%10 ih,e ij gksuk crkbZ tkrh gSA cjkenxhLFky ,d ,slk LFkku gS tgka ij Lohdr :i ls vke yksxksa dh vkoktkgh jgrh gSA ,sls gkykr esa tCrh vf/kdkjh }kjk cjkenxh dh dk;Zokgh ds nkSjku Lora= xokgku dks u j[kk tkuk iwjh dk;Zokgh dks nwf”kr dj nsrk gSA uksfVl izn’kZ ih 19 esa cjkenxh vf/kdkjh us ;g ntZ fd;k gS fd dksbZ Hkh Lora= xokg cuus dks rS;kj ugha FkkA uD’kk ekSdk izn’kZ ih 29 ds voyksdu ls Li”V gS fd ftl LFkku ij cjkenxh dh xbZ mlds lkeus cl LVS.M ,oa dbZ nqdkus ekStwn FkhA vykok blds] ;g Hkh fofp= ckr gS fd tCrh vf/kdkjh ds eqrkfcd] cjkenxh ,oa nLrkost cukus dh dk;Zokgh ekSds ij gh djh xbZ ijUrq tCrh ls l **a** caf/kr lHkh dkxtkr dEI;wVªhdr gSA blls Li”V lkfcr gksrk gS fd lHkh nLrkostkr ekSds ij ugha cukdj ckn esa rS;kj fd, x,A
(3 of 3)
[CRLLA-122/2016]
mijksDr lHkh gkykr dks ns[krs gq,] bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa ;g Li”V gS fd ;g
cjkenxh dh dk;Zokgh QthZ Fkh ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk v;kphx.k dks nks”keqDr ?kksf”kr djus esa fdlh izdkj dh Hkwy ugha dh xbZ gSA
rnuqlkj] jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk lkjghu gksus
ds vk/kkj ij fujLr dh tkrh gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk jsdMZ ykSVk;k tk,A
¼lanhi esgrk½ U;k;kf/kifr
,l-,u-yksgjk@20
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court's order quashing the respondents' complaints violated the statutory procedures laid down in sections 8(15) and 29 of the Bhartiya Nagar Nigam Samiti Act, 1985.
State of Rajasthan
Malkeet Singh
Charanjeet Singh
S.B.
lanhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
