State v. Ram Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Jodhpur granted leave to the State of Rajasthan to appeal against the acquittal of the respondent. The respondent was directed to appear and furnish a bond.
What did the court decide?
Application for grant of leave to appeal allowed; memo treated as appeal; respondent directed to furnish bond.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 101 / 2016 State of Rajasthan
----Appellant
Versus Ram Kumar son of Hari Ram, by caste jat, r/o 4, Rohi Badopal, Tehsil Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh. ----Respondent
_____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr.R.K.Bohra, P.P.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.H.S.Sandhu.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Judgment / Order
02/08/2017
Issue notice.
Shri Sandhu appears for the respondent Ram Kumar. Thus, service is complete.
Heard learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the respondent and perused the judgment impugned.
This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial grounds for grant of leave to the State of Rajasthan for filing an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent vide impugned judgment.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there are valid grounds to grant leave to the State for filing an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Rajasthan
- respondent
Ram Kumar son of Hari Ram
Coram
Sandeep Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLLA/101/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court