The court disposed of a contempt petition as infructuous upon the petitioner's submission that the impugned order had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench Jaipur
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.70 of 2012
Satyanarayan & Company Vs. Dharmendra Bhatnagar & another
Date of Order ::: 16.05.2016
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
Mr. Vikram Singh Yadav, for Mr. Het Ram Agrawal, Counsel for the petitioner Mr. V.D. Gathala, Addl. Govt. Counsel for the respondents ***
On the joint request made by the learned counsel
appearing for the parties, hearing of the present petition is preponed from 27.05.2016 to today and the same is taken up on the Board.
In the instant contempt petition preferred under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, a grievance has been made by the petitioners that the order dated 23.12.2011 passed by ld. Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ petition No.18256/2011 has not been complied with.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that since the order passed by this Court has been complied with, present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
(Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] J.
2
/ashok/
Satyanarayan & Company
Dharmendra Bhatnagar
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
