Transfer application withdrawn after the parties effected a compromise; counsel stated she did not wish to pursue it. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn without recording reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.228
TA-269-2024 Date of Decision: 12.08.2024
REKHA
....Applicant
Versus
JITENDER SONI
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Ms. Sweta Beniwal, Advocate for the applicant.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (ORAL)
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that compromise has been effected between the parties. As such, she does not want to pursue with the present transfer application and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
(ARCHANA PURI) 12.08.2024 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SonuAnu 2024.08.1 2 3 1 5:530:05 I attest to the accuracy and accuracy and authenticity of this documentintegrity of this document
Rekha
Jitender Soni
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
