Applicant sought to withdraw the transfer application due to technical omissions; counsel stated he did not wish to pursue it and prayed for dismissal as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.212
TA-201-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.08.2024
JANAK RANI
....Applicant
Versus
SEEMA AND ORS
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. Krishan Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Hasrat Brar, Advocate for the respondents.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to some technical omissions, he does not want to pursue with the present transfer application, which may be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
Ordered accordingly.
(ARCHANA PURI) 12.08.2024 JUDGE ��� Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Anu 2024.08.13 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
JANAK RANI
SEEMA
ARCHANA PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
