Revision petition dismissed for want of prosecution after petitioners failed to appear despite service, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.252
CR-8108-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.08.2024
PARDEEP SIWACH AND OTHERS
....Petitioners
Versus
SRS ROYAL HILLS AND ORS
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:None.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
In consonance with the order dated 16.01.2024, service of petitioner was duly effected, after the withdrawal of the Power of Attorney by learned counsel earlier making appearance on behalf of them.
Today, none has made appearance on behalf of the petitioners, despite service.
Seemingly, the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the instant revision petition. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ARCHANA PURI) 09.08.2024 JUDGE ���� Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sonu 2024.08.09 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Pardeep Siwach and others
SRS Royal Hills and ors
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
