The High Court dismissed the revision petition as infructuous because the petitioner failed to appear despite two calls, noting the lower court had already finally dismissed the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.251
CR-7593-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.08.2024
STATE BANK OF INDIA
....Petitioner
Versus
ASHISH AND ANOTHER
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:None.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
Even on second call, none has made appearance on behalf of the petitioner. On the last date of hearing also, none had made appearance.
However, it has been verified by the office from the website of the concerned District Court that the suit has been finally dismissed by the court below.
In the given circumstances, the instant revision petition has become infructuous and the same is hereby dismissed, as such.
| (ARCHANA PURI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 09.08.2024 | JUDGE | ||
| ���� | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No | |
| Whether reportable | : | Yes/No |
Sonu 2024.08.09 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
STATE BANK OF INDIA
ASHISH AND ANOTHER
ARCHANA PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
