Revision petition listed with no appearance for the petitioner. The office verified from the District Court website that the main case had been disposed of, rendering the petition infructuous, and the High Court dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.268-2
CR-448-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.08.2024
SUKANT VARMA
....Petitioner
Versus
NEELU
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:None.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
Even on second call, none has made appearance on behalf of the
petitioner.
However, it has been verified by the office from the website of the concerned District Court that the main case has been disposed of.
In the given circumstances, the instant revision petition has
become infructuous and the same is hereby dismissed, as such.
(ARCHANA PURI) 09.08.2024 JUDGE ���� Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sonu 2024.08.09 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Sukant Varma
Neelu
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
