Petitioners had already approached the Court in a prior petition which stood disposed of; State counsel pointed this out, and the present petition was held to be infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
140 INCOMP-716-2024 Date of Decision: 20.11.2024
AMIT DUTT AND ORS ......... Pe��oners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:None for the pe��oners. Ms. Swa� Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
20.11.2024 Jyo�-II
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2024.11.21 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Amit Dutt and Ors
State of Punjab
Another
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
