Disposed

Gurdeep Singh v. M/S Krishna Agriculture Steel Works and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC19 Nov 2024CRM-A/52/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for condonation of 305 days' delay in seeking leave to appeal against an acquittal was allowed, leave was granted and the main appeal admitted. Respondents were exempted from furnishing bail bonds on their undertaking to surrender if required.

What did the court decide?

Delay condoned; leave to appeal granted; appeal admitted; respondents exempted from bail bonds on undertaking to surrender as directed.

Gurdeep Singh Vs M/S Krishna Agriculture Steel… — Cheque Dishonour | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CRM-A-52-2021 (O&M)

¶2

��

¶3

302 CRM-A-52-2021 (O&M) Gurdeep Singh vs. M/s Krishna Agricultural Steel Works and others

¶4

Present: Mr. Prabhjot S. Waraich, Advocate and Dr. Khushbir K. Waraich, Advocate for the applicant.

¶5

Mr. B.S. Bajwa, Advocate for the respondents.

¶6

¶7

CRM-28242-2021

¶8

Present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 305 days in filing the

¶9

application for leave to appeal.

¶10

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.

¶11

Delay of 305 days in filing the application for leave to appeal, is condoned.

¶12

CRM-A-52-2021

¶13

Applicant’s counsel submits that the present application was filed against acquittal in

¶14

the year 2016 and he has a very good case on merit.

¶15

Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned and leave to appeal should not be granted. He further submits that in case, this Court grants leave to appeal and admit the main appeal, its turn will not come for hearing for decades, as such pendency of the appeal may be treated in-consequential for the respondent.

¶16

Leave to appeal granted.

¶17

Counsel for the respondents submits that they be exempted from furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds before the concerned trial Court or Chief Judicial Magistate. He undertakes to surrender before the majesty of Court as and when this Court directed to do so or in case of reversal of the judgment.

¶18

Given such undertaking, there shall be no need to furnish bail bonds/surety bonds by

the respondents.

Main appeal

Admit.

ANJU RANI 2024.11.22 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

¶23

CRM-A-52-2021 (O&M)

¶24

��

¶25

List for final hearing on its own turn as per its queue following the roster of Negotiable Instruments Act.

¶26

It is clarified that the pendency of this appeal shall be in-consequential for any purpose.

¶27

To be heard with CRR-1079-2020.

¶28

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE

¶29

19.11.2024 anju rani

¶30

ANJU RANI 2024.11.22 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

Gurdeep Singh v. M/S Krishna Agriculture Steel Works and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurdeep Singh v. M/S Krishna Agriculture Steel Works and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sub Divsional Appropriate Authority Vs Kiran and Ors.

Akash @ Kaka and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Amit Vs State of Haryana

Bhupinder Kaur Vs Manjit Lal and Ors.

Sandeep Singh & Ors. Vs Baldev Singh

Rajinder Pal @ Another Vs State of Haryana