Leave to appeal under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. against an acquittal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant-appellant remained unrepresented despite repeated adjournments and warnings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
257 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A No.1188-MA of 2017(O&M) Date of Decision: 19.11.2024
Bhupinder Kaur ... Applicant-Appellant
Versus
Manjit Lal and Others … Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: None for the applicant-appellant.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J .
If the applicant still remains absent on the next date of hearing, this Court shall dismiss the leave to appeal for non-prosecution.”
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
19.11.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No.
Sonia Puri 2024.11.21 11:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Should leave to appeal against acquittal be granted where the applicant remains unrepresented and absent?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhupinder Kaur
Manjit Lal
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
