A petition whose purpose was not fulfilled because the State had received no representation; the court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
141 INCOMP-373-2024 Date of Decision: 20.11.2024 SURESH KUMAR ......... Pe��oner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:None for the pe��oner. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Sr. D.A.G, Haryana.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
20.11.2024 Jyo�-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2024.11.21 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Suresh Kumar
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
