Disposed

Shaveta Kumari and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Jan 2024CWP/29231/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought mandamus for five socio-economic criteria marks under an Haryana advertisement. Counsel relied on a prior coordinate-bench decision in Suman Lata; prayer restricted to deciding a detailed representation. State counsel agreed to pass a reasoned order before selection results are declared. Petition disposed of accordingly.

What the court decided

AI extract

Shaveta Kumari and Another Vs State of… — Education and Admissions | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

2024:PHHC:003437

CWP-29231-2023

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

116

¶6

CWP-29231-2023 Date of Decision: 11.01.2024

¶7

Shaveta Kumari and another

¶8

…Petitioner(s)

¶9

Versus

¶10

State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

¶12

Present:Mr. Navnit Sharma, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners

¶13

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana

¶14

¶15

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)

¶16

This petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent/Commission to grant five marks to the petitioners under Socio-Economic criteria pursuant to advertisement no.2 of 2023, dated 21.02.2023.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the claim raised herein by the petitioners is squarely covered by judgment of this Court, dated 17.10.2023, rendered in CWP No. 15290 of 2023 titled Suman Lata v. State of Haryana and others , and detailed representation on that basis will be filed by the petitioners within one week from today. At this stage, the petitioners restrict their prayer to a direction to decide the said representation within a

¶18

specified period.

¶19

PAYAL 2024.01.12 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2024:PHHC:003437

CWP-29231-2023

-2-

Learned State counsel, appearing on advance notice, submits that result of selection has not been declared so far on account of pending petitions, CWP No.17751 of 2023 and CWP No.15826 of 2023. He further submits that in case detailed representation is filed by the petitioners, the same shall be decided by passing a reasoned order in the light of judgment rendered in Suman Lata case ( supra ) before the declaration of selection result.

¶24

In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, learned for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.

¶25

5. Ordered accordingly.

¶26

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 11.01.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶27

PAYAL 2024.01.12 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Shaveta Kumari and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Shaveta Kumari and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Dinesh Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Jasbir Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Gurnam Ram Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Savita Arora Vs Maharishi Dayanand Univ. and Anr.

Sandeep Kumar Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission and Anr.