Writ petition disposed of by consent in terms of an earlier similar writ petition; the Department is restrained from effecting any recovery from the petitioners until a related pending writ petition is decided.
Department restrained from effecting any recovery from petitioners till decision of CWP No. 12052 of 2019 (Samunder Singh).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:003217
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
214 CWP-11949-2018 Date of Decision: 11.01.2024
Gurnam Ram
…Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:Mr. Parth Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Jawahar Lal Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the instant petition can be disposed of in terms of the order dated 21.03.2023 passed in the similar writ petition, CWP No. 26715 of 2018, titled Alok Kumar and others v. State of Haryana and others .
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
11.01.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2024.01.11 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Alok Kumar and others v. State of Haryana and othersRelied on
CWP No. 26715 of 2018
Samunder Singh and others v. State of Haryana and othersReferred
CWP No. 12052 of 2019
Gurnam Ram
State of Haryana
Tribhuvan Dahiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
