Petition disposed of based on state counsel's submission that the issue is settled by a Supreme Court judgment in Vikas Kumar. Petitioners asked to make representation to respondent No.2 in accordance with law.
Petition disposed of; petitioners directed to make representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:002296
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.: 106
Civil Writ Petition No.5872 of 2019 (O & M) Date of Decision: January 10, 2024
Dinesh Kumar & another
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Haryana & others
..... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
PRESENT : - Mr. Raje Ram Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
. . .
Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral)
Learned State counsel submits that the issue raised herein stands finally settled by the Supreme Court vide judgment rendered in Civil Appeal No.7136 of 2022, Vikas Kumar & others vs. State of Haryana & others . In case the petitioner has any claim in terms of the judgment, he can make a representation to respondent No.2, which will be considered in accordance with law.
(Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge
January 10, 2024 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No
AVIN KUMAR 2024.01.10 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vikas Kumar & others vs. State of Haryana & othersRelied on¶15
Civil Appeal No.7136 of 2022, Vikas Kumar & others vs. State of Haryana & others
Dinesh Kumar
another
State of Haryana
others
Tribhuvan Dahiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
