The petition was disposed of as infructuous upon the State submitting that the petitioners had already been provisionally promoted. No precedent-setting issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
����������������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
242
CWP No.3325 of 2023 Date of Decision : 10.1.2024
Anil Kumar and another
..... Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate, for Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners
Mr. Parveen Mehta, DAG, Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J. (ORAL):
Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the
petitioners have been provisionally promoted to the post of Sub Divisional Clerk vide order dated 5.7.2023. Accordingly, the petitioners’ claim stands satisfied and the petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as such.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
10.1.2024
A��w���
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ashwani Kumar 2024.01.11 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Anil Kumar
State of Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
