Sandeep Kumar v. Haryana Staff Selection Commission and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:003671
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
253
CWP No.21099 of 2023 Date of Decision : 11.1.2024
Sandeep Kumar
..... Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: Mr. Ashish Naik, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Parveen Mehta, DAG, Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J. (ORAL):
Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner’s name has been recommended for appointment on the post of Craft Instructor Draughtsman (Civil), category no.44 pursuant to advertisement no.12 of 2019, vide letter dated 6.10.2022. Therefore, the petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as such.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
11.1.2024
A��w���
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ashwani Kumar 2024.01.12 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sandeep Kumar
State of Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court