Single judge disposed of a writ petition (Article 226/227) seeking directions against State officials alleged to harass the petitioner and her family due to her husband's criminal involvement, without providing substantive reasoning or granting specific relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No. 8535 of 2024
Date of Decision: 04.09.2024
Gaganjot Kaur
...Pe!!oner
Versus
State of Punjab and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Ms. Shivani, Advocate for the pe!!oner.
Ms. Swa! Batra, D.A.G., Punjab (through V.C.).
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
04.09.2024 Jyo! Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
1
Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.06 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh
Gaganjot Kaur
State of Punjab
ANOOP CHITKARA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
