The High Court dismissed the petitioner’s petition for quashing the FIR. The court recorded that charges were already framed and the case disposed of with liberty to challenge the framing order, counting the pending period against delay limits.
Petition dismissed; liberty granted to challenge the order framing charges.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
�
CRM-M-42460-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
120
CRM-M-42460-2024 Date of Decision: 03.09.2024
Vikram Singh
....Pe��oner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Ms. Swa� Batra, D.A.G., Punjab. (through video conferencing).
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta | .on | Sec.ons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08 | 14.07.2022 | Vigilance Offences Ludhiana |
Bureau, Wing |
Economics Punjab, |
7, 7-A of PC Act and 120-B, 409, 201 IPC |
Seeking quashing of above cap�oned FIR, pe��oner has come up before
this Court by filing the present pe��on under Sec�on 528 of BNSS (482 CrPC) on 28.08.2024.
JYOTI 2024.09.05 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRM-M-42460-2024 �
this Court, shall not be counted while calcula�ng the delay in challenging the framing of charges. Pending applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
| (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|
| 03.09.2024 | ||
| Jyo�-II | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes | |
| Whether reportable? | No |
JYOTI 2024.09.05 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Vikram Singh
State of Punjab and another
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
