Seeking directions to official respondents to conduct fair investigation in the FIR captioned above and to consider representation dated 14.08.2024 (Annexure P-3), petitioner, claiming to be an aggrieved person, has come up before this Court under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be contended and satisfied if his representation (Annexure P-3) which is pending with the official respondent is decided in a time bound manner by passing a speaking order.

¶16

Notice served upon the official respondents through the State counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of notices to the private respondents is required.

¶17

Let the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police decide the representation (Annexure P3) within one month, either himself/ herself or by authorizing and delegating

¶18

Sonia Puri 2024.09.06 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

¶20

CRM-M-43496-2024

¶21

it to any officer holding IPS cadre. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned order, and the same be communicated to the representationist(s) without delay.

¶22

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to file fresh petition or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law.

¶23

It is clarified that there is no adjudication on merits. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogation of the petitioner is required in any cognizable case. It is also clarified that this order shall not be construed as order of stay of arrest of the petitioner in any case.

¶24

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Petitioner and State can download this order and other relevant particulars from the official web page of this court and attest it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use.

¶25

Petition is allowed to the extent mentioned above . All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶26

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE

¶27

04.09.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No.

¶28

Sonia Puri 2024.09.06 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Savir Khan and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Savir Khan and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikram Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another

Gian Chand Vs Ramesh Chand & Ors.

Rohit Vs State of Punjab

Gulshan Kumar Sonu Vs State of Haryana and Others

Gaganjot Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others

Khushdeep Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.