Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging cancellation of bail and forfeiture of surety bonds; petitioner, having failed to comply with an earlier direction to surrender before the trial court, sought withdrawal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
276 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.10997 of 2024(O&M)
Date of Decision: 03.09.2024
Rohit
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab … Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Prashant Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gauravdeep Singh Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J .
| FIR | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | |||
| 6 | 08.01.2022 | Saleem tabri, Ludhiana-Police | 379-B(2), 34 IPC |
| Commissionerate |
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
03.09.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No.
Sonia Puri 2024.09.04 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rohit
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
