Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC. Counsel submitted the complainant had resiled from a compromise, and sought leave to withdraw the petition.
Liberty to file fresh petition either on compromise or on merits; pending applications disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
276 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 38056 of 2024
Date of Decision: 04.09.2024
Khushdeep Singh and another ...Pe%%oners
Versus
State of Punjab and another …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for the pe%%oners.
Mr. Jasjit Singh, D.A.G., Punjab.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta%on | Sec%ons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0132 | 22.08.2022 | Sangat, District |
420, 120-B IPC |
| Bathinda |
to file fresh pe%%on either on compromise or on merits. All pending applica%ons, if any, stand disposed.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
04.09.2024 Jyo% Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
1
Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.06 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Khushdeep Singh and another
State of Punjab
Complainant
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
