A one-page order recording that a pending revision petition was permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioner on account of compromise between the parties, with supporting documents taken on record. The order decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE H I GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108+218 CR M -36060-2024 in/and CR R -539-2020
Dat e of Decision: 10.09.2024
Mohan La l and others .… Petitioner
Versus
Kiran Bal a .... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Shashank Vardaan Shar m a, Advocate for the petitioners.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
CRM-36060-2024
Application is allowed, as pra y ed for.
Copies of compromise deed d ated 02.08.2023 and decree of divorce d a ted 01.04.2024 passed by t he learned Family Court-II, Jalandhar, filed along with the applic a tion are taken on record as Annexure P -20 and P-21, respectively, sub j ect to all just exceptions. CRR-539-2020
At the very outset, learned co u nsel for the petitioners submits that he ma y be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition as, the matter sta n ds compromised between the p a rties.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
10.09.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.09.10 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Mohan Lal and others
Kiran Bala
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
