Criminal revision petition withdrawn by petitioners after settlement of all disputes between the parties; court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
217-I
Criminal Revision (F) No.486 of 2022 Date of decision :-09.09.2024
Anil Kumar and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
Suman Jangra
…..Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:Mr. Rohit Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Anurag Jain, Advoate with Mr. Ajay Kamboj Gurpreet, A dvocate for the respondent.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioners submits t hat since all the disputes bet w een the parties have been settled, h e has instructions to withdra w the present petition and accordin g ly prays for withdrawal of the s a me.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if an y , shall stands disposed of.
Septemb e r 09, 2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2024.09.10 09.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Anil Kumar and others
Suman Jangra
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
