The petitioner's application for anticipatory bail was withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE H IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
103 CR M -M-44840-2024
Dat e of Decision: 10.09.2024
Ajay .… Petitioner
Versus
The State o f Punjab .... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Sanjeev K. Virk, Advoca t e for the petitioner.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in this 1st petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya N agarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , is for grant of anticipatory bail to the peti t ioner in case FIR No. 209 da t ed 05.08.2024 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 74, 78, 351 o f the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Po l ice Station City Kapurthala, Di s trict Kapurthala.
Learned counsel for the peti t ioner submits that he may be permitted t o withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
10.09.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.09.10 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay
The State of Punjab
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
