Petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of a magistrate's order was withdrawn by the petitioner as infructuous; disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
257
CRM-M-45428-2019
Date of Decision: 04.09.2024
Manmohan Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Harsh Manocha, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Seeking quashing of impugned order dated 20.04.2019, passed by the Sub Division Judicial Magistrate, Guhla, petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 482 CrPC.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
04.09.2024
anju rani
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable? No
ANJU RANI 2024.09.06 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manmohan Singh
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
