Petitioner sought permission under Section 151 CPC to withdraw the main revision petition on ground of compromise. Application allowed; main case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
125 CM-22184-CII-2024 in/and CR-917-2024 Date of Decision: 12.12.2024
BAL KISHAN VERMA @ BAL KRISHAN VERMA …..Pe11oner
Vs.
ARUN VERMA AND ORS. …..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate for the applicant-pe��oner.
������
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
CM-22184-CII-2024 in/and CR-917-2024
This is an applica�on filed under Sec�on 151 CPC praying for withdrawal of the main pe��on i.e. CR-917-2024 on the ground of compromise by preponing the same from 07.01.2025.
For the reasons men�oned in the applica�on, the same is hereby allowed. The main case is preponed and the same is taken on board today itself.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the pe��oner that the ma.er has been compromised, the main case i.e. CR-917-2024 is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
| ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.1 | 2.2024 | JUDGE | |
| pry | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes |
||
| Whether reportable | : No |
PRIYANKA 2024.12.12 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bal Kishan Verma @ Bal Krishan Verma
Arun Verma
Ors.
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
