Petitioner sought quashing of proceedings. Petition was withdrawn by counsel. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn but directed the trial court to conclude the trial within six months given the petitioner's long custody period.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; trial court directed to conclude trial within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.207
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-40517 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:11.12.2024 Gautam Kaushik .....Pe00oner Vs. State of Haryana .....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:Mr. Aditya Sanghi,Advocate for the pe��oner. Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for the complainant.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the pe��oner has placed on record copy of the statement of PWs- Akshay and Shri Bhagwan, who have since been examined but did not support the case.
December 11, 2024 ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RENU 2024.12.11 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing should be withdrawn?
Gautam Kaushik
State of Haryana
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
