Petitioner absent and unrepresented in a maintenance-related petition; court dismissed it in default for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
130 CR-3281-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.12.2024
UNNAS KHAN ALIAS UNNASH KHAN …..Pe--oner
Vs.
RUKSINA AND OTHERS …..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: None for the pe��oner.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
On 09.08.2024, the following order was passed by this Court:-
“Learned counsel for the pe��oner seeks �me to obtain necessary instruc�ons from the pe��oner as to whether he is prepare to clear all arrears of maintenance as was allowed by the trial Court concerned.
Adjourned to 22.10.2024.”
(DEEPAK GUPTA) 12.12.2024 JUDGE
pry
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
PRIYANKA 2024.12.12 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Unnas Khan alias Unnash Khan
Ruksina
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
