Dismissed
Tarif v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/49332/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-49332-2024 Date of Decision: December 11, 2024
Tarif …Peoner**
Versus
State of Haryana …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
A er arguing for some �me, statement is made by learned counsel for the pe��oner, so as to withdraw this pe��on, but with a prayer to direct the trial Court to expedite the trial considering the custody period of the pe��oner.
However, the trial Court is directed to make every possible endavour to expedite the trial by giving short dates.
| December 11, 2024 | (DEEPAK GUPTA) |
|---|---|
| sarita | JUDGE |
| Whether reasoned/speaking: | Yes/No |
| Whether reportable: | Yes/No |
Sarita Rani 2024.12.11 04:04 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should maintain the withdrawal of the criminal petition despite the prisoner's custody exceeding six years.
Tarif Pe
State of Haryana
DEEPAK GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court