Revision petition against framing of issues in a suit challenging a 2019 sale deed; petitioner sought a direction that the trial court decide the validity of the sale deed under issue No.4. Petition was permitted to be withdrawn with such direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
131
CR-4239-2024 Date of Decision: 12.12.2024
HARSHAI ALIAS HARSHAY …..Pe))oner
Vs.
BIMLA DEVI …..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the pe��oner.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the pe��oner has placed on record cer�fied copy of the order dated 13.09.2021 passed by the trial Court, whereby issues were framed by the trial Court.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) 12.12.2024 JUDGE pry Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
PRIYANKA 2024.12.12 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court should be directed to decide the validity of sale deed Vasika No.6857 dated 26.02.2019 as framed in issue No.4.
Harshai alias Harshay
Bimla Devi
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
