The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed an appeal in default due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their legal representatives on the date of hearing despite service.
Appeal dismissed in default/non-prosecution due to non-appearance of appellant's legal representatives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
330
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-81-1997 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 14.10.2022
PARTAP SINGH
...... Appellant(s)
Versus
HARBHAJAN SINGH AND OTHERS
..... Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: None.
Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the respondents.
LISA GILL, J.
None had appeared on behalf of the appellant/his legal representatives on the last date of hearing whereon the following order was passed:-
“None appears on behalf of legal representatives of the appellant, despite service.
In the interest of justice, adjourned to 14.10.2022.
In case there is no representation on behalf of legal representatives of the appellant on the next date of hearing, this appeal may be dismissed in default/non-prosecution.”
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant/his legal
representatives.
It appears that the appellant/his legal representatives are not interested in pursuing the matter any longer.
Appeal is accordingly dismissed in default.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
14.10.2022
Sunil Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SUNIL 2022.10.17 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
PARTAP SINGH
HARBHAJAN SINGH AND OTHERS
LISA GILL
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
