The High Court dismissed the appeal in default because the appellants did not appear on the hearing date despite being notified via e-mail, reportedly being uninterested in pursuing the matter.
Appeal dismissed in default due to non-appearance of appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
304
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-483-1992 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.10.2022
KARTAR KAUR AND ANOTHER
...... Appellant(s)
Versus
CHHOTO AND OTHERS
..... Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: None.
LISA GILL, J.
None had appeared on behalf of the parties on the last date of hearing. Learned counsel for the parties were directed to be notified of the date fixed.
Today none has appeared on behalf of the appellants despite learned counsel being informed through e-mail. It appears that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the matter any longer.
Appeal is accordingly dismissed in default.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
14.10.2022 Sunil
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SUNIL 2022.10.17 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Kartar Kaur
Chhoto
Lisa Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
