The single-judge bench dismissed the appeal in default due to the death of the learned counsel for the appellants and a resultant lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
305
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-1169-1992 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.10.2022
TEK CHAND AND OTHERS
...... Appellant(s)
Versus
VIJAY SINGH
..... Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Vardaan Seth, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for respondent no.1.
LISA GILL, J.
As learned counsel who had filed this appeal had unfortunately passed away, notice was issued to the appellants for today. However, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the matter any longer.
Appeal is accordingly dismissed in default.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE 14.10.2022 Sunil Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SUNIL 2022.10.17 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Tek Chand And Others
Vijay Singh
Lisa Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
