This order dismisses the appeal in default due to the appellant's absence on the hearing date despite being notified. The court observed the appellant was not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
303
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-2009-1991 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.10.2022
SIRI CHAND
...... Appellant(s)
Versus
RAJ BALA (DECEASED) THROUGH LR GAJE SINGH
..... Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for LRs of the respondent.
LISA GILL, J.
None had appeared on behalf of the appellant on the last date of
hearing. Today again there is no representation on behalf of the appellant despite learned counsel being notified.
It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter any longer.
Appeal is accordingly dismissed in default.
Copy of this order be conveyed to the appellant at the given
address.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
14.10.2022
Sunil
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SUNIL 2022.10.17 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
SIRI CHAND
RAJ BALA (DECEASED) THROUGH LR GAJE SINGH
LISA GILL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
