Single-judge order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a murder case. State counsel recommended bail as the petitioner has joined investigation, leading the court to make the earlier interim order absolute.
Order dated 09.01.2019 for anticipatory bail made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-64442 of 2018 Date of Decision: 22.02.2019
Sucha Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate, for Mr. Ruhani Chadha, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep S. Gill, DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.44 dated 12.06.2018 registered under Sections 302 and 34 IPC at Police Station Nurmahal, District Jalandhar Rural.
On instructions from ASI Jagtar Singh, learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 09.01.2019 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
(RAMENDRA JAIN)
February 22, 2019 JUDGE R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.02.26 09:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sucha Singh
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
