Petitioner sought anticipatory bail; court noted joint investigation and complainant's compromise affidavit; made earlier order absolute.
Order dated 17.09.2018 made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-40594 of 2018 Date of Decision: 21.02.2019
Sweety
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate, for Dr. Deipa Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Kumar Makkar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Advocate, for the complainant.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through instant petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.213 dated 27.04.2018 registered under Sections 120-B, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC at Police Station S.G.M. Nagar, Faridabad.
Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for interrogation. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that parties have compromised the matter and complainant has no objection to the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. He has produced affidavit of the complainant in this regard, which is taken on record.
In view of above, order dated 17.09.2018 passed by this Court
is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
(RAMENDRA JAIN)
February 21, 2019 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.02.25 09:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be made absolute given the joint investigation and compromise.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sweety
State of Haryana
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
