Dismissed
Nand Kishore v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/21671/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the immediate petition. The petition was dismissed on withdrawal.
What the court decided
AI extract
Petitioner withdrew the immediate petition. The petition was dismissed on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-21671-2018 DATE OF DECISION:-21.02.2019
NANDKISHORE
...PETITIONER...
V.
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
...RESPONDENTS...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. S.S. Nain, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Makkar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ****
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of
instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
21.02.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No whether reportable: Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.02.22 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
NANDKISHORE
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court